Agentspay

For businesses

Agentic Commerce Platform - Deploy Agents That Spend Safely

Put agents to work on procurement, subscriptions, and ad spend without losing control of the budget. Caps, approvals, and audit your finance team will actually approve.

In short

An agentic commerce platform lets a business deploy AI agents that buy, renew, and pay on its behalf, under finance-grade controls. Agentspay gives those agents wallets with hard caps, human approval above a threshold, scoped virtual cards, and an audit trail that ties every spend to an intent, owner, and policy, so finance and compliance can sign off.

The problem

Why this is hard without a control plane

  • Finance will not approve agents touching company cards without caps and sign-off.

  • You need to answer which agent spent this, on whose instruction, for any transaction.

  • Compliance needs an immutable record and instant revocation.

The control surfaces

What you get with Agentspay

Each surface is enforced in the platform, not in fragile agent code.

Further reading: agent spend at month-end close, how to reconcile agent spending, and who is liable for an agent purchase. Or see what it costs on the pricing page.

See policy decide

Watch a transaction run the gauntlet

Pick a scenario and watch policy auto-approve the routine spend or hold the big one for a human, then write the audit row.

Agent Payments Console

Pick an agent

Payment intent

intent:

Policy evaluation

Human approval required

This spend is over your approval threshold. Approve it to issue a scoped card, or deny it.

Scoped virtual card issued

Agentspay

single-use

Wallet budget

spent of

Audit trail

Frequently asked

Questions people ask about For businesses

How do you control what AI agents spend at a company?

Move the control from the person to the instrument. Each agent gets a funded wallet with a hard cap, an allowlist of approved merchants and categories, an approval threshold for larger spending, and an audit trail. The checkout screen used to be the informal control, and agents are designed to skip it.

Who is liable when an AI agent buys something wrong?

The company or person who owns the agent. No jurisdiction treats an agent as a legal person capable of holding an obligation, so authority flows from whoever funded the instrument and set the policy. That makes the funding and policy decisions the real liability boundary, not the agent's own behavior.

How do you give finance visibility into AI agent spending?

Capture attribution at authorization instead of reconstructing it at month end. Every charge should already carry the agent, the human owner, the task and the policy verdict. Agent spend is high volume and lacks the usual artifacts, so there is no expense report or browser session to rebuild the story from.

Do you need a separate card for each AI agent?

Separate credentials per agent, and often per task or merchant, are what make limits and attribution work. A shared card means you cannot cap one agent without capping all of them, cannot revoke one agent's access, and cannot tell from a statement line which agent caused a charge.

How do you set an AI agent spending policy?

Start from what the agent must buy to do its job, then write the smallest policy that permits exactly that: approved merchants and categories, a per-transaction ceiling, a cumulative period budget, and the threshold above which a human decides. Broad policies narrowed later tend to stay broad.

Ship agents that spend safely

Create a wallet, write a policy, and issue a scoped virtual card in an afternoon. Sandbox-first and rail-neutral.

Never moves money without policy